| |
| |
| |
Analysis of a Newly Identified Variable Star In Aquarius
Heath Gibson
Abstract
This report is the result of an independent research project designed
to plot the light curves of variable star candidates of an intermediary magnitude
range little researched by astronomers. Research was done using two 24”
telescopes located at Mt. Wilson and Table Mountain. One variable star was found, and the data
indicates it is an eclipsing binary, that is, two stars which rotate around
each other. My research advisors
were Barrett S. Duff, Deputy Director and Project Scientist of Telescopes
in Education (TIE); Dr. Robert Korechoff, Physicist, JPL; and Dr. Milan Mijic,
Professor of Physics and Astronomy, California State University, Los Angeles.
1.
Introduction
This report is the outcome of an experiment begun in August, 1999,
to trace the magnitudes and plot the light curves of variable star candidates
of an intermediary magnitude range, in order to determine if any were variable
stars, and if so, what type(s). A variable star is one which varies in brightness over a certain
period of time. The period of
time in which it varies changes according to the type of variable star; therefore,
the star’s period is used to determine its type. There are three different
types of variable stars: an intrinsic variable whose change in magnitude occurs
as a direct result of a single star’s unstable nature; a cataclysmic
variable, whose variability is a consequence of a star either “going
nova” or exploding into a supernova; and an eclipsing binary in which
one star eclipses another in a binary star system.
Few
astronomers have observed variable stars in the intermediary magnitude range,
defined as 10.0 to 18.0. This
gap exists because amateur astronomers, with their smaller and less sophisticated
equipment, usually focus on bright stars having magnitudes less than 10.0,
whereas professional astronomers usually focus on dimmer stars having magnitudes
above 18.0. Because little research
has been done on the stars in this intermediate range, no one knows if these
variables have characteristics similar to those known variables outside of
this magnitude range. To help
fill this information gap, I chose to research variable star candidates from
this intermediate range. My hypothesis
was that I would find an intrinsic variable with a short period of a week
or two.
To choose variable star candidates for research, I downloaded a
file from the U.S. Naval Observatory (USNO) web site that contained approximately
1,600 suspected variables. My
foremost selection criterion was a magnitude range between 10.0 and 18.0.
Then, in order to maximize the number of hours I could work on this
project each evening, I searched for stars that would be rising at about thirty-five
degrees above the horizon in the east at 8:00 p.m., the approximate time of
dusk. Using this selection criteria, I found four variable star candidates
near the celestial equator whose characteristics were unknown. I examined the change in their brightness
over the four months the stars were visible in order to determine whether
or not a variable existed in the group. Once I proved a variable existed, I narrowed my research to
that star and then analyzed the data to determine what type of variable it
was.
2.
Previous Work on the Four Suspected Variable Stars
Before my research was conducted, the four suspected variables
had been placed in the USNO-SA2.0 Catalog and had been assigned an average
red and blue magnitude; this was the only information that had been collected
on them up to then. The following
tables give the equatorial coordinates of each star (suspected variable and
reference stars). For ease of
reference, I renamed each variable candidate N, O, P, and Q respectively;
each variable candidate has its own two or three reference stars with names
A, B, and C.
Table 1. Data for Suspected Variable N (USNO-SA2.0 Catalog #O18030273)
|
Name |
Right Ascension |
Declination |
Magnitude |
|
|
|
hr mn sec |
deg mn sec |
Red |
Blue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
VAR N |
21 43 54.205 |
—00 13 40.12 |
13.4 |
14.8 |
|
REF A |
21 43 49.490 |
—00 11 19.26 |
13.4 |
14.7 |
|
REF B |
21 44 05.474 |
—00 16 05.09 |
13.5 |
14.4 |
|
REF C |
21 44 17.246 |
—00 14 54.53 |
13.4 |
14.4 |
Table
2. Data for Suspected Variable O (USNO-SA2.0 Catalog #O280031312)
|
Name |
Right Ascension |
Declination |
Magnitude |
|
|
|
hr mn sec |
deg mn sec |
Red |
Blue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
VAR O |
21 46 10.061 |
—01 06 46.00 |
11.5 |
13.5 |
|
REF A |
21 46 00.713 |
—01 09 57.86 |
13.0 |
14.0 |
|
REF B |
21 46 29.576 |
—01 10 13.22 |
13.4 |
14.5 |
Table
3. Data for Suspected Variable P (USNO-SA2.0 Catalog #O33020146)
|
Name |
Right Ascension |
Declination |
Magnitude |
|
|
|
hr mn sec |
deg mn sec |
Red |
Blue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
VAR P |
21 40 12.731 |
—01 22 48.68 |
14.0 |
14.4 |
|
REF A |
21 40 01.678 |
—01 21 31.34 |
13.8 |
15.5 |
|
REF B |
21 39 59.087 |
—01 24 19.83 |
14.0 |
14.9 |
|
REF C |
21 40 05.909 |
—01 27 48.78 |
13.5 |
14.3 |
Table
4. Data for Suspected Variable Q (USNO-SA2.0 Catalog #O33040049)
|
Name |
Right Ascension |
Declination |
Magnitude |
|
|
|
hr mn sec |
deg mn sec |
Red |
Blue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
VAR Q |
21 46 48.007 |
—01 32 44.74 |
12.6 |
12.9 |
|
REF A |
21 46 37.575 |
—01 29 30.43 |
10.9 |
12.3 |
|
REF B |
21 46 31.116 |
—01 35 15.42 |
12.7 |
13.8 |
|
REF C |
21 46 25.447 |
—01 36 51.68 |
10.8 |
12.4 |
3. Materials Used for Project